How a Washington, DC, apartment building changed architectural design | The Washington Times

The history of Washington, D.C.’s architecture can be traced to a building in the city’s historic district, a century-old landmark.

The Washington Monument, as it’s commonly known, was built in 1921.

Its original plan was to be an archway that would take visitors on a tour of the U.S. Capitol building and the District’s skyline, then lead them into the heart of the city.

But the architectural design of the landmark didn’t follow the original plan.

Instead, it was a massive structure that stood over the entire city.

A new tower was proposed, and the architect and architects who worked on it were paid a pittance.

The new structure was called the Washington Monument.

Its construction cost $5 million.

In 1926, the architect of the new monument was Harry L. Sturgess.

The architect wanted the structure to be so large that visitors would walk through it on foot.

The design called for two floors, with each floor a single story of one- and two-story buildings.

But, Sturges had some reservations.

He didn’t want to be seen as being too heavy-handed with the architectural decisions made for the monument.

So, he decided to build the monument in the form of a box.

This box would hold the building’s main elements, like a staircase and an arch.

The box would also be a place where visitors could walk up and down and have their photo taken with the monument, according to the Architectural Conservancy.

The building itself was constructed of concrete, with a concrete arch.

There were no windows on either side.

It was a very light structure, according the Architect of the Capitol, Edward A. Lasky.

The architecture was designed by Laskys firm of architects.

A few weeks after the building was completed, it fell.

Its main structure, the Arch, collapsed.

A fire destroyed the building.

The architects and architects were not paid for the work.

The fire destroyed one of the most iconic architectural elements of the Washington, and its importance to the city was not recognized until much later.

Lissner was a leading architect in the District of Columbia at the time.

The arch was not only important to the architecture of the building, but also to the District.

The structure was used as a memorial to the fallen monument and was an important part of the district’s history, according Lissers architect, Henry H. Lessner.

Littner also designed the structure that would become the Arch of Independence.

The city’s new monument is also named for Lissners grandson, Robert Lissler.

But that is not all.

L.S., who died in 1965, had many architects in mind when designing the new building.

One of them was Lissinger.

He was a friend of Robert L. Lisners grandfather, George Washington.

Lischner was one of several architects working on the new structure.

He also had experience in the building industry.

The two had a long working relationship.

Liselier, a firm that designed many historic buildings in the United States, designed the Arch.

Lislers son, Frederick Lisser, designed a number of buildings in Washington, including the Arch and the Capitol.

He died in 1952.

A large portion of the work on the Arch came from Lissett’s firm, Lissener, Sturdes, Laskies.

It took a year and a half before the structure was complete.

The Arch was built to honor Robert Lislners grandson.

The National Park Service, which oversees the Arch on behalf of the nation, has called the work of Lissingers, Struggles, and Sturgesses a “national treasure.”

The work of the architects was so successful that L.C. Sturde, who is now the Arch’s senior architect, said he was proud of his work.

“He’s the architect that built the Arch,” he said.

“The Arch is very important to our city.

“It was a lot of fun and it was all about the building and how we can be involved in the architecture business in a meaningful way.” “

I’ve had a wonderful time,” Sturdess added.

“It was a lot of fun and it was all about the building and how we can be involved in the architecture business in a meaningful way.”

Sturgis had an idea to design the Arch in the same way that Lissittners father, Henry, had.

It wasn’t until the Arch was completed in 1922 that the Architect had a chance to see it from inside.

He wanted to see what would happen if he and the other architects would build it.

They did.

In 1925, the first floor of the Arch went up.

It became the Arch as it stands today.

The first floor became a meeting room, the second a restaurant and the third a dining room.

The Architect and the architects who designed the building were paid about $5,000 for their work.

In 1927, the building became a